The police of foods in the USA, criminalizes the biological culture and private

Law HR 875The new Order of Things tries it enslaves with each means the humanity।They know that when you check the food, you check absolutely the persons.In the USA therefore, they try they pass law that will prohibit the private culture from individual individuals. This legislation aims evidently in the private culture and [zootrofia], that it aims in has the person to [zein] in periods of economic poverty and [ellepsis] goods.In whoever has garden in the courtyard of his house or some part where it raises for private use animals, him will be imposed fine.It establishes concrete ways of production of foods. Whoever does not cultivate with the “legal” methods it will be persecuted.This bill has been placed in the council of delegates and we will see in the very near future [an] it is voted. The truth is that minimal from the Representatives they have read him.This is a phenomenon that happens very often in the USA. The ignorance managing in their such subjects leads in they take their decisions according to the prompts of “special” on them.If a such legislation passes, she will be devastating for the simple world because thus the persons will be invalid they are protected in a period of crisis.This legislation however is “benediction” for the big factories of culture as Mosanto, the ADM and Sodexo Tyson.It will influence anyone it even produces foods, if they do not sell him but only him consume. It will litteraly place the all independent farmers and the producers of foods except the market, because the enormous pecuniary sums that need in order to they are arranged to the agricultural methods of production of factories.If the persons select they cultivate without use industrial model, as chemical fertilizers and pesticides they will being in variety of harassments from this completely new organism that never did not preexist. Rightly, a entire new governmental organisation is recommended simply for the policing of foods, naturally for our protection.Points of danger:- Legally it commits the government owned ministries of agriculture and culture to the application of federal governing lines that effectively it will deprive from the government owned power makes nothing other than practise policing in the foods for charm of federal address.- [Stin] substance criminalizes the biological agriculture, but does not use the term biological.- It influences anyone it cultivates foods, even if it does not sell him but him it consumes.- It influences anyone that produces meats all kinds, included the wild preys.- This legislation has so much wide field of force that each form of culture or production of foods can be rendered outlaw. Do not exist more details that are curious pondering the size of legislation.- [Sto] department 103 is almost entirely for the administrative aspect of legislation. It will allow the nomination of permanent employees through factories of agriculture and culture and the cartels and their characterization as expert that will allow them to determine and to interpret the legislation.[Tinos] the part you believe that they are to take?- [Sto] department 206 fixes what should be considered as installation of production of foods and who they will be the metres that should be imposed in the installations of production of foods.The formulation of legislation has so much wide force what for the garden in the [piso] courtyard it could even be imposed fine and more.- [Sto] department is required the Agricultural Ministry of also Culture it acts as police of foods and it imposes the requirements of production of foods. This deprives the force of state and constitutes violation of 10th [tropopologias] Constitution of (USA but also more).Stalin didn't naturalise agricultural methods of production that allowed in his administration to acquire the control of supply of foods?Stalin didn't use the foods for the control of population?With this legislation they advance in gagging of ministers with regard to what they can and what they cannot say in the population, [syntagmatologei] rules that will force the persons to be based exclusively on the government, while these practise the control of money and foods. And that is named this? Dictatorship and absolute control.A thing for which I am sure is that minimal, if they exist somebodies, they have read the legislation and when the subject comes to voting it is, more from likely that they will receive [yp]��[psin] them the opinion of some other for that they will vote.The other for which I am very sure is that, this legislation it has been drawn up from lobbyist and experts of industry.See here for more with regard to the law…
See here for more with regard to the law…